First of all, I need to say that I got a review copy of this book for free from BookRooster.com. I'm glad I did, for positive as well as negative reasons, all of which I'll get to.
Huntress is the introduction to Grace Murphy, a romance writer who, on the day her divorce is final, meets her biological mother, the goddess Diana. Grace is the snarky mother of an 11-year-old boy, with whom she seems to have a very loving, trusting relationship. She shares custody of her son with her husband, who has Dylan on some weekends and holidays.
Now, on to the reasons why I'm glad I got this book for free. First, it introduced me to this very fun and interesting character. Grace is irreverent, self-deprecating, and can't seem to keep her mouth shut. I like the universe this author has created, with her take on Greek mythology. There are also some interesting supporting characters, such as Drew, Rose, and Zachary.
However, I found my enjoyment of the book dampened quite a bit by editing problems. There were some serious punctuation issues, such as a blatant misuse of semi-colons; continuity issues (when, exactly, did the ex-husband first encounter Drew?); and the confusion of words ("physics" and "psychics" getting mixed up -- she meant to use the former).
In addition to the editing problems, I think that Grace's voice, while fun and, as I said before, irreverent, may be off-putting to some. She is definitely not a narrator who will last the ages. Her language is very 2010.
I hope that the editing issues are taken care of in the next book in the series. Oh, yes, this is the first book in a series. And that particular point is not a topic to be discussed here. Just know that, if you choose to read this book, you won't be getting what I would consider a professional product. Enjoy the story, try to ignore the mistakes.
(This review originally posted on Goodreads June 26, 2011.)
1 comment:
Recently purchased this junk. I almost passed thanks to your review, but then noticed author told you the book was edited again. Yet, my copy (purchased since)is full of the mistakes, including what you used as examples. Needless to say, your original review stands as accurate.
Wanted to post on book's page, as I think there's something off about the ratio of good to negative reviews, but wanted to see if she proved her claim to you by giving you the new book, or if she is using you (without your knowledge) to sell more books. Seems strange she would make a point of telling you, but wouldn't do so on her own site, or in the other reviews, etc. There's no mention anywhere online of what she told you.
Thank you for being honest in your reviews. I've been checking out your others on Amazon for book suggestions.
Post a Comment